Archive for August, 2007

Over A Million Killed in Iraq Caused by US-led Invasion!

Friday, August 31st, 2007

Add this to your website
The number is shocking and sobering.
It is at least 10 times greater than most estimates cited in the US media, yet it is based on the only scientifically valid study of violent Iraqi deaths caused by the U.S.-led invasion of March 2003.
That study, published in prestigious medical journal The Lancet, estimated that over 600,000 Iraqis had been killed as a result of the invasion as of July 2006. Iraqis have continued to be killed since then. The graphic above provides a rough daily update of this number based on a rate of increase derived from the Iraq Body Count. (See the complete explanation.)
This devastating human toll demands greater recognition. It eclipses the Rwandan genocide and our leaders are directly responsible. Little wonder they do not publicly cite it. Here is simple HTML code to post the counter to your website and help spread the word.

Actions you can take right now
Sign the petition telling Congress that about a million Iraqis have likely been killed and urging them to end this war now. A large number of signatures on this and other petitions is a compelling way to keep pressure on Congress as there are more votes on the war. Add your name»
Write a letter to the Editor: Letters are one of the most frequently-read sections of a newspaper. Our tool makes it easy to craft one. Write a letter»
Tell your friends about this estimate of Iraqi deaths. Spread the word now»

Support this Campaign
With a tax-deductible contribution, you can help us continue this important work. Click to contribute.

Post the Iraqi Death Estimator on your website
Fight attempts to minimize Iraqi suffering and remind visitors to your site of the awful human costs of continued war. (If you post the counter to your website, email us and we will add your link to the list.)
Here is some simple code that you can cut and paste into the HTML of your website. The counter will automatically update over time.

If you post this counter without using the above code, you must link it to http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq/iraqdeaths.html

See Foreign Military Bases from Outer Space

Friday, August 31st, 2007

See the world’s foreign military bases from outer space

…There might be one near you. Get involved in shutting it down!

30 August 2007

> Download military bases google earth file (KMZ file, 115KB)

> Install google earth

> Feedback form. Help us map all the bases worldwide

> Get involved in the No-bases movement

In March 2007, TNI revealed some of the human and environmental costs of the thousands of military bases in its report, Outposts of Empire: The case against foreign military bases. Now you can for the first time see the global reach of foreign military bases from outer space and then zoom in close for aerial shots of key bases such as US base Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, Nato Headquarters in Skopje Macedonia, or the imposing number of US bases on the small island of Okinawa, Japan.

Researchers from US universities, NGOs Transnational Institute and Fellowship of Reconciliation used official sources, security websites, and private research to map more than 800 bases in more than 60 countries. The US has by far the largest number of bases, but French, British, German, Russian, as well as joint international bases such as NATO and EUFOR bases have all been mapped.

The resulting Google Earth programme is a striking visualisation of the extent to which foreign military bases in the 21st Century reach right across the globe. It also points to why there is growing community resistance against military bases from Greenland to French Polynesia, Paraguay to Korea, which has crystallised into a powerful global movement (www.no-bases.org).

For security reasons, countries often do not provide detailed information on the exact locations of their foreign military bases and installations. As a result, the map is still far from complete. However it is hoped that the map will evolve and improve in the coming months with the help of activist and researcher’s inputs from all over the globe. Help us improve and expand the map by checking the position of a base near you and send us a mail with corrections or additions using this form

_________
Credits: The project of mapping bases was initiated by John Lindsay-Poland, Ethan Flad and Brian McAdoo expanding on map work pioneered by Zoltan Grossman at Evergreen State College in Washington (See Fellowship magazine, Winter 2007 issue (Vol. 73, no. 1-3, www.forusa.org). The work was built on by TNI intern, Lena Strunk using data which is cited for each base.

French Role in Rwanda Genocide!

Friday, August 31st, 2007

French troops ‘raped girls during Rwanda genocide’
By Steve Bloomfield in Kigali
Published: 31 August 2007
French soldiers stationed in Rwanda during the genocide in 1994 have been accused of “widespread rape” by a Rwandan commission investigating France’s role during the conflict.

The commission, which is due to publish its final report in October, will also provide fresh evidence that French soldiers trained the Interahamwe, the extremist Hutu militia responsible for most of the killing, and even provided them with weapons.

The allegations threaten to plunge relations between Rwanda and its former colonial master to a new low. It could also lead to Rwanda seeking reparations from France at the International Court of Justice. “That is something we are considering,” said one government official.

France’s support for the genocidal Rwandan regime – both before and during the slaughter – has been well documented, but the new report sheds some light on the extent of that backing.

In particular, it provides the first evidence that French soldiers sent to Rwanda during the genocide as part of a UN-mandated force to protect civilians carried out “widespread rape” of genocide survivors. Jean Paul Kimonyo, one of the commissioners, said: “They were asking for Tutsis – not women – Tutsis.”

The commission was established by the Rwandan president Paul Kagame in April last year and is headed by a former minister of justice. France has accused the commission of being little more than a kangaroo court and when the seven commissioners visited France earlier this year, French authorities made it clear that they were not welcome.

Dr Kimonyo, himself a former press aide to Mr Kagame, said he initially shared some of those fears.

“The law which established the commission said France was guilty already. We were very uneasy about it. But the evidence is overwhelming.”

Based on testimony given at public hearings by genocide survivors and former soldiers trained by French forces, plus evidence from piles of official paperwork left by the fleeing Hutu regime, the commission believes it has enough proof to convince the international community.

Dr Kimonyo said: “France was directly involved in the preparation of the genocide. They were training the Interahamwe in a systematic manner. They were training them to kill, to kill as fast as possible as one witness said, using knives and machetes. What were they training them for? It is very disturbing.”

France has so far refused to acknowledge any role it played during the genocide. Instead, last year a French anti-terrorism judge, Jean-Louis Bruguière, claimed Mr Kagame was responsible for the act which started it, accusing the-then head of the RPF of shooting down the plane carrying then president Jubenal Habyarimana. Most experts believe the plane was shot down by the same Hutu extremists who had been planning the genocide.

Mr Habyarimana’s death prompted a wave of killing by Hutu extremists, that resulted in 800,000 Tutsis and politically moderate Hutus slaughtered in just three months. In response, Mr Kagame threw the French ambassador out of Kigali, ordered the closure of the French cultural centre and removed Radio France International from the airwaves.

As relations with France have progressively soured, those with Britain have improved dramatically. English has become one of three official languages, Rwanda has applied to join the Commonwealth, and last year they established a national cricket board.

More importantly in Rwandan eyes, the UK has become the largest donor, spending £46m last year. France has gone from being the largest international donor before the genocide to the smallest now.

There are small signs that France’s attitude towards Rwanda may be shifting slightly. The last ambassador had been attempting to build bridges and was widely liked by Rwandan government officials.

The role of France’s new Foreign minister, Bernard Kouchner, will be crucial. M Kouchner, who has signalled his intention to visit Rwanda before the end of the year, was there during the genocide, as the head of a French humanitarian organisation. Although he was seen as being close to the French president, François Mitterrand, M. Kouchner later publicly admonished his government’s lack of support for Mr Kagame after the Rwandan genocide ended.

How France intervened

October 1990

Tutsi-led rebel forces, the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), invade the north of the country. President Juvénal Habyarimana, a Hutu backed by the French, calls in support. Three hundred French paratroopers secure Rwanda’s International Airport and fight off the invading forces. In a few days 600 more French troops are sent in to “protect and evacuate French citizens”.

1991

France continues to send military advisors and arms. The army grows from 5,000 to 28,000.

February 1992

Lieutenant Colonel Chollet, the commander of French forces in Rwanda, becomes army chief of staff and advisor to the Rwandan presidency.

3 February 1993

The RPF launches a major attack, capturing the town of Ruhengeri and moving towards the capital. Hundreds of French troops are sent to Rwanda along with huge quantities of ammunition to back up the government forces.

20 February 1993

Threatened by the rapid French deployment, the RPF forces call a unilateral ceasefire and withdraws.

6 April 1994

President Habyarimana’s plane is shot down, triggering the genocide of almost one million Tutsis and moderate Hutus.

June 1994

French troops launch “Operation Turquoise”, aiming to establish a “safe zone” in the south-west of the country. Although some killings continue in the zone, President François Mitterrand later claims it has saved “tens of thousands”.

Advertiser Links…

New Car | Broadband | Credit Cards | Home Insurance |
cruises with Dialaflight
Book your cruise holiday at a fantastic price with Dialaflight….
www.dialaflight.com
Mobile Phone Offers
Fantastic value mobile packages with free phone offers. Save £5….
www.t-mobile.co.uk/offers
Invest in Property Abroad, Brookes&co
Invest in Property Abroad. The Bahamas, 13% rental return, 20% below market valu…
www.brookesproperty.com

Also in this section

Welcome to Hillywood: how Rwanda’s film industry emerged from genocide’s shadow
Lighting up Africa: Why today’s residents are still making do with wax and wicks
Mia Farrow’s exclusive dispatch: I am a witness to Darfur’s suffering
African Union talks peace but Sudan’s tribal leaders remain divided
Wildebeest migration at risk from Serengeti airport plan

A

A

A

Editor’s Choice

Keira Knightley

Confounding her critics with her latest role
Super-rich furry animals

Four-legged legacies (and other pet payouts)
Antiques Roadshow

Thirty years old and it’s still looking as good as new
Partners in grime

Rapper Kano teams up with some unlikely accomplices
Fighting malaria

Scientists find weak link in ‘earth’s most dangerous animal’
Please mind the gap

Meet the people behind Britain’s most iconic voices
Full Clearing links
Authoritative advice and exclusive UCAS search link
Independent services
Independent Offers
A-Z site map
Indy 100 prices
MORE: Travel podcasts
SAVE: Travel offers
FREE: Email headlines

The Independent Promcasts with FREE example tracks

Dating | Gaming | Photos | Utilities deals | Media pack

Introducing the IoS blogs
Day in a page

Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |

Find articles published on:

Top stories

Protest raises fears over death of Politkovskaya
Search this site: Independent.co.uk
The Web

Terms of Use |

Privacy Policy |

Privacy Policy |

Corrections |

Sign up for our free daily news update |

Freelance contributions |

RSS Feeds |

Work for INM |

Contact us |

LondonCareers.net |

© 2007 Independent News and Media Limited

Protest Injustice!

Friday, August 31st, 2007

http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq/iraqdeaths.html#post

September Showdown or Sellout? The Choice is Ours!

Congress returns on September 4th after a month’s vacation. It has been 8 months since this Congress took power with a mandate to end the occupation of Iraq and hold Bush and Cheney to the rule of law. This Congress has funded the occupation, legalized unconstitutional spying, and promised never to impeach. Will this trend continue? Can we afford to allow it to? We have killed over a million people, and the death rate is double this year what it was last year, according to the Associated Press.

There are signs that the tide may be turning. A serious movement in Congress to impeach Gonzales helped lead to his departure. Twenty congress members of conscience have signed onto articles of impeachment for Cheney . Congressman John Conyers says he wants impeachment proponents to come to his office to urge him on ( watch the video ). And 70 congress members have committed to oppose funding the occupation, while funding a withdrawal by January 2009 or sooner.

What can we do to push Congress in the direction of peace and justice?

For starters, urge your Representative to join the 70 House Democrats who will only support Iraq funding for the protection and safe redeployment of all our troops out of Iraq before Bush leaves office.
http://www.democrats.com/peoplesemailnetwork/115

In addition, big marches are planned for the 15th and the 29th in Washington, but the pressure will be all month long. September has something for everyone!

There are local events all over the country on the September calendar:
http://www.democrats.com/event/2007/09/01/month/all/all/1

Here are some of the most exciting national (and international) dates:

Aug. 29 - Sept. 2: International Tribunal on Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in New Orleans, La.: http://www.internationaltribunal.org

Aug. 31 - Sept. 1: People’s Poll and Peace Rally in Ft. Worth, Texas. This will be a huge protest at the time and place where the Republican Party is planning to have 20,000 delegates from throughout the U.S. and all of the Republican presidential candidates attend their Straw Poll Convention: http://www.texansforpeace.org/peoplespoll/schedule.htm

Sept. 4: Stand watch over Congress! Join us in the gallery and STAND to show we are watching what this Congress does:
http://www.americastandswatch.org

Sept. 6: Call Congress! This one is for everybody. Call your representative and your two senators at 202-224-3121. Tell them: I want you to act now to end the war and occupation of Iraq. The Congress has the Constitutional right and a moral responsibility to use the power of the purse to withdraw all U.S. soldiers and contractors from Iraq on a rapid and binding schedule. Four and a half years of this war is too long - it has to end now!

Sept. 7: Choose Peace Concert! Emma’s Revolution, Randi Driscoll, Free Radicalz, and more, in New York City:
http://www.democrats.com/node/14104

Sept. 8-16: Vacation for Peace in Italy!
The people of Vicenza, Italy, have been struggling against the construction of a proposed new U.S. military base in their city. They have organized a week of camping, actions, debates, rallies, concerts and initiatives. Join them: http://afterdowningstreet.org/node/26308

Sept. 8: The War and Rural America! Farmers and veterans meet in New York City: http://www.democrats.com/node/14102

Sept. 11: March of the People Arrives in DC just in time for the White House’s expected sales pitch for extending the occupation:
http://www.marchofthepeople.org

Sept. 11: Washington, D.C.: 3 PM to 7 AM following day, all night vigil in front of Tower Guard, by the Capitol Building, with the Action Response Team reading 12,000 impeachment cards with messages from people all over the Country to impeach Bush and Cheney! Come join and read some of these incredible hand written messages.
http://arrestcheneyfirst.org

Sept. 12: “Tell the Truth” event outside your local media outlet: http://www.democrats.com/node/14134

Sept. 12: 11 AM, deliver 12,000 impeachment messages to Nancy Pelosi personally. All are welcome to attend and stay for a nice chat with the Democratic Leader!
http://arrestcheneyfirst.org

Sept. 14-21: Days of Decision, nonviolent action at congressional offices to end the occupation of Iraq: http://www.declarationofpeace.org

SEPTEMBER 15:

Thousands of Americans from around the country will join together in Washington, D.C., to demand the impeachment of Dick Cheney and George W. Bush and insist on the immediate end to the occupation in Iraq. Please join us: http://www.impeachbush.org

Thousands of Americans from around the country will join together in Washington, D.C., to demand the impeachment of Dick Cheney and George W. Bush and insist on the immediate end to the occupation in Iraq. Please join us: http://www.impeachbush.org

Or hold a local event:

Use the occassion of September 15 to hold an impeachment rally in your town. You’ll find big marches in Alabama, Kansas, and Florida on the calendar , and several more here . Hold your own. Visit your congress member’s offices. Hold a Honk-to-Impeach event. Hold a sit-in. Screen a video. Event resources are here: http://afterdowningstreet.org/eventresources

Sept. 16: Lobby training in Washington, D.C., and organizing meetings, issue briefings, legislative updates, state caucuses. Grassroots America, Iraq Vets Against the War, A.N.S.W.E.R., Veterans for Peace, AfterDowningStreet, and many other organizations have planned a full day of opportunities for networking and advocacy training: http://www.grassrootsamerica4us.org

Sept. 17: Constitution Day, Goodbye Gonzo Day, and National Truth in Recruiting Day: Iraq Veterans Against the War is launching a Truth in Recruiting campaign on September 17, 2007. IVAW chapters around the country, including Washington DC, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia, will be holding local events, but you don’t need an IVAW chapter in your area to participate:
http://www.ivaw.org

Sept. 18: Congressional Challenge Day: If you can be in Washington, D.C., plan to go with us to visit your Congress Member and Senators: http://www.grassrootsamerica4us.org

Sept. 19: Protest Bush at the United Nations: If you can be in New York, plan to join us in protesting Bush at the United Nations:
http://www.unitedforpeace.org/article.php?id=3371

Sept. 20: Rivers of Blood - A Day of Non-Violent Resistance in DC: There will be a legal and logistical briefing on September 19 at 6:30 p.m. followed by a day of nonviolent action on Capitol Hill:
http://www.democrats.com/node/13713

Sept. 20: Protest Racism in Jena, La. On September 20th, Mychal Bell–the first of the Jena 6 to be convicted–is scheduled for sentencing. If the District Attorney has his way, Mychal will face 22 years in prison. It’s a horrifying moment for Mychal, his parents, and the rest of the Jena 6 families. It’s also a perfect time for those who can to come to Jena, in person, and stand with them:
http://www.democrats.com/node/14126

Sept. 21: International Day of Peace / Iraq Moratorium Day! On September 21 and on every subsequent Third Friday, millions of Americans will break with their daily routine to take some concrete step to demand an end to the war and the return home of the troops. The hallmark will be the wearing of black ribbons and armbands, in mourning for all of those who have died in this senseless adventure:
http://www.Iraqmoratorium.org
Also in Spanish:
http://moratorioirak.org

http://www.troopsoutnow.org

Sept. 22-29: Stop the War at Home and Abroad! Troops Out Now! Impeach Bush & Cheney for War Crimes! End All Occupations — from Iraq to Palestine to Haiti to the Philippines!

Sept. 22-29: Encampment in Front of Congress to STOP the War (will include an Impeachment Day)

Parallel Encampment and Demo in Los Angeles

Sept. 25: New York City, NY: 8:30 AM to ALL DAY LONG: George Bush visits the UN General Assembly, we will not allow the time of his visit to go unnoticed! Join in marches around the city, acts of CD, and lots of other events to show the world we want the war criminal out of our City!
http://stopbushsept25.org

Sept. 29: National March on Washington:
http://www.troopsoutnow.org

____________

The Next War

Through it all, we need to keep up the pressure to prevent an attack on Iran. Please sign the petition, read the latest news, and be prepared:

http://www.dontattackiran.org

#####

Read Glen Ford’s Black Agenda Report

Wednesday, August 29th, 2007

Katrina, War, Impeachment and the Black Gulag
by Glen Ford
August 27, 2007

Black Agenda Report

It is way past time that long-held assumptions of how African Americans
will forge a path to social justice and political self-determination be
re-examined. Two-plus generations of reflexive fealty to the Democratic
Party has resulted in Democrats behaving more like Republicans.
Uncritical applause for Black faces in high places has brought us
betrayal on an unprecedented scale. At this juncture in history, African
Americans face the political crises of Katrina, escalating imperial war
as national policy, failure to impeach flagrant criminals in public
office, and the ongoing horror of mass Black incarceration. Past
“allies” and current misleaders must be discarded, and a new movement,
begun.

We are witnessing the final dissolution of both the Democratic Party and
established Black leadership formations as effective agents of domestic
social change and world peace. Corporate power has swallowed the Party
whole, and is smothering or absorbing the residue of what was once a
powerful Black people’s movement. The devastation is all but complete,
as is evident when one examines the response to the crises of Katrina,
the Iraq War, the necessity to impeach, and the hellish and inexorable
growth of a Black American Gulag through mass incarceration.

The Black Gulag - the product of a people-savaging national public
policy that began as a mass white societal response to the Sixties
Freedom Movement and metastasizes each year regardless of crime rates -
isn’t even an issue for Democratic leadership. No wonder, since both
Democrats and Republicans have conspired over two generations to place a
million African Americans behind bars at any given moment, creating a
toxic prison culture that poisons every arena of Black life. During the
watch of Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton’s husband, Bill, more
Blacks were thrown in prison than under any other president in history.

Mass Black incarceration is not a priority among Black elite formations,
either. A deep historical current in Black political culture avoids even
a discussion of horrendous imprisonment rates that tear at the very
fibers of Black society. Preachers would rather internalize and moralize
the ongoing state assault on Black life, while the Black misleadership
class, as I have written, is “more embarrassed than outraged” at the
volcanic emergence of a million-man-and-woman Black Prison Nation,
through which doors multiple millions of the next generation will pass.

The battle against Black mass incarceration cannot be said to have been
lost, because it never began. These are the rotten fruits of the
impotence of - no, betrayal by - the class that demanded the Freedom
Movement be shut down, after Dr. Martin Luther King’s death, so that
they would have the space and quiet to pursue newly available business
and public office opportunities. Vote for me, or support my economic
upward mobility, and it will set you free, said the New Class. They
lied, and the masses of Black Americans are less politically focused
than at any time since Emancipation. More have lost their basic freedoms
than at any time since slavery.

Katrina - the monstrous boil on the national political body that burst
with the levees, two years ago - should have been a watershed moment for
Black America, a grotesque but clarifying historical window into the
real nature of U.S. society and its rulers. For the masses of Blacks, it
was. Young people who never knew Jim Crow in the raw were forced to
recognize basic truths, as when Kanye West uttered what to him seemed a
revelation: “George Bush doesn’t like Black people.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, having left Katrina out of her “first
hundred hours” agenda in January, this month toured New Orleans with a
15-member Democratic delegation, making the proper noises of solidarity
with the fraction of the Black population that remains. She was also
careful not to offend the white Democrats who are as culpable as
Republicans in preventing the city’s far-flung Diaspora from achieving
their “right to return,” “right of citizenship in the city,” “right to
participate in the rebuilding” of New Orleans and the other rights
outlined in the 12-point Citizens Bill of Rights promulgated by the
African American Leadership Project, September 22 2005, less than a
month after the deluge.

Pelosi’s response to the pleas of Black New Orleans was to muzzle House
Democrats, including the Congressional Black Caucus, barring them from
participating in Republican-led hearings on Katrina and its aftermath.
The rationale was that the GOP, then in control of all committees, would
dominate the conversation. But of course, the same logic would have
precluded Democratic participation in any hearings on any subject while
Republicans remained in the majority - yet the injunction was only
imposed on Katrina. Pelosi’s real concern was that the Katrina issue
was, in Chuck D’s immortal words, “Too Black, Too Strong,” and might
cause white voters to identify the Democratic Party too closely with
African Americans, endangering prospects of capturing the House in 2006.
As a body, the Congressional Black Caucus swallowed Pelosi’s Kool-Aid,
with the notable exception of Rep. Cynthia McKinney, who participated in
the hearings in defiance of leadership.

The same “don’t get too close to the Blacks” rationale dictated that
Pelosi leave Katrina out of her “first one hundred hours” pitch in the
2006 mid-term campaign. Then, this Spring, Pelosi unleashed Black
lawmakers and others to hold hearings on a variety of Katrina-related
subjects -a gesture that looked more like loosening a safety valve on
Black discontent than a prelude to restoration of New Orleans’ original
population. Black Democratic Whip James Clyburn (SC) announced the
belated offensive, but 18 months after the catastrophe, the historical
moment had passed, skillfully circumvented by the congresswoman from San
Francisco, and acquiesced to by a meek and compliant Black Caucus. There
can be no doubt that, as the 2008 elections near, Pelosi will again
quash all substantive proposals to make Black New Orleans whole, once
again aggressively shedding excessive Democratic Party identification
with Black interests. The August Democratic tour of the Gulf was a
pitiful gesture, a harmless and farcical “Black Summer of Discontent”
that will pass unnoticed by history.

Black misleadership, as presently constituted, is also fated for the
dustbin, having utterly failed the historical test of Katrina. As I
wrote in October, 2005:

“Cruel history presents the catastrophe as an unwanted opportunity, a
test of Black people’s capacity for the operational unity craved by the
vast bulk of African Americans. The pain and anger in Black America is
all but universal, and demands collective action, the outcome of which
will largely define the true State of Black America as it has evolved
over the last two generations.”

If Katrina could not galvanize Black institutional structures to
decisive action, resulting in the mobilization of millions, then those
structures are moribund and flaccid. The lost opportunity for mass Black
action can never be regained. Contrast this with the response of mainly
Hispanic immigrants, their sons and daughters, to the threat of
repressive legislation. Millions of Latinos staged coordinated
demonstrations in scores of cities, with the active assistance of
Spanish-language media. Yet, on the Black side of the divide, as we
wrote in the inaugural issue of Black Agenda Report:

“If the national Black political infrastructure, such as it is, could
not set masses in motion after Katrina, when African Americans were as
one in their concentrated anger and collective will to do something,
then what currently passes for leadership will never effectively
mobilize Black folks for anything. They have lost the tools and desire
to fight, and cannot function as leaders even when the people cry out
for common action.

“Had Black people been called out en masse, they would have come - but
the historical moment has slipped away, wasted. In a few years, a new
generation of Black activists will deploy themselves in structures of
radical resistance, their world views shaped by the multiple crimes of
Katrina. But in the near term, it must be recognized that not only have
African Americans been numerically overtaken by Hispanics, we have been
eclipsed in mass organizing, as well.”

War - by now one of the few pistons running the engine of the U.S.
economy, while also guaranteeing its eventual collapse - is the enemy of
every agenda item of the Historical Black Consensus. George Bush’s
policy of endless warfare condemns Black America to permanent deferral
of urban transformation, in all its aspects. There can be no
revitalization of the cities - except under corporate terms under which
Black removal is a prerequisite - while the public treasury is poured
into the black hole of the War Industry.

In the aftermath of 9/11, decades of struggle against racial profiling
were erased in an instant; now, every non-Aryan-looking person is fair
game for profiling, and Black complaints are deemed petty, as if removed
from history. Vast income and wealth disparities must take a back seat -
all the way to the back - to the spending imperatives of war, most of
which ultimately winds up in the hands of what I dubbed the “Pirate
Class,” epitomized by Halliburton, Bechtel and other pillars of the
ruling order - which also happen to be the behemoth “reconstructors” of
the Katrina-ravaged Gulf region. Wars have always accelerated the rate
of structural change in societies. Corporate wars - the only kind the
U.S. wages, these days - direct all restructuring to the most
non-productive corporate coffers.

The forces that animate George Bush intend to keep the restructuring
process on full throttle. As I wrote in December, 2002, three months
before the U.S. invasion of Iraq:

“The predator-scavenger class must…reproduce itself to meet the
demands of permanent war, changing fundamentally the relationship of
forces within American business as a whole. The Cheney-Bush pirates are
about to birth a new brood of billionaire pillagers and parasites with
no direct connection to the well being of the domestic economy and those
of us who depend on it.”

Black folks used to complain about the abandonment of the cities, and
our resultant disproportionate suffering. Permanent War, an integral
component of the latest stage of U.S. imperialism, marginalizes everyone
but the super-privileged, and Black folks most of all. Yet much of Black
leadership and the African American public reflexively support Barack
Obama, whose imperial bent is not even closeted. Obama wants to add
100,000 additional soldiers and Marines to the U.S. Armed Forces - more
manpower for the imperial mission that feeds the coffers of War Industry
and starves out any hope of domestic social transformation. No “new” New
Orleans that embraces the aspirations of the original population - no
revitalized cities in which the current residents needs are served. No
wonder Obama has no plan for urban America, or to ameliorate rampaging
inequalities; militarism will ensure there will be no money, no matter
who is president.

Hillary Clinton, who garners most of the other fraction of Black
support, is wife of the man who crushed majority Democratic opposition
to NAFTA “free trade” legislation, in an alliance with Republicans. This
version of “free trade” and war are pieces of the same cloth, as are the
unequal rules of the dollar-based oil business, and international
bankers’ “debt” practices in the developing world. All must be backed up
by the ultimate threat of military enforcement of the prevailing order.
Thus, Obama’s call for 100,000 new troops as the U.S. continues its
unique “mission” in the world.

African Americans have historically opposed U.S. military adventures
abroad - “White Man’s Wars,” we used to call them - and still do, as all
the data show. But a bankrupt Black misleadership, many of whom mollify
their constituents with occasional anti-war rhetoric, at the end of the
day gives a pass to the militarism that will be the death of every Black
dream of a just society. Genuine anti-war lawmakers like California
congresspersons Maxine Brown and Barbara Lee are among the exceptions in
the Congressional Black Caucus; many other CBC members have signed on to
the Out of Iraq Caucus that Waters and Lee lead, but nevertheless vote
for continued funding of the war. In the Congress, Black leadership
becomes a charade, and “progressive” white Democratic leadership, the
mask Nancy Pelosi continues to wear, is most often mislabeled.

Impeachment - the only way to stop the criminals in power from
committing executive mayhem, and to prevent succeeding presidents of
either party from using the tools of oppression inherited from Bush - is
a no-brainer in Black America. As BAR’s Bruce Dixon wrote last week, “No
constituency is as heavily in favor of impeachment as Black America.”
The entire roster of the Congressional Black Caucus should be on record
as favoring impeachment of Bush and Cheney, by popular acclamation of
their constituents - but only a fraction are. African Americans and
genuine progressives look to my old friend, Rep. John Conyers, chairman
of the Judiciary Committee where impeachment proceedings must begin, as
a leader on this issue. But Conyers’ leader is Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker
of the House. Although many of us anticipated more of him in this
crisis, he cannot possibly be expected to act as a Black “leader.” He is
embedded in a white dominated Democratic Party machinery that long ago
decided Blacks were an albatross around their necks - despite the fact
that many of them cannot win dogcatcher offices without us.
If there is a fool out there that thinks we are advocating some kind of
accommodation with Republicans, he should check into the nearest psych
ward. We must go back to basics, to the ingredients that brought us so
far in such a short time in the brief period of the Freedom Movement.
Moribund misleadership must be replaced by mass mobilizers, organizers
responsive to the essentially progressive instincts of the Black public
at-large - a people whom noted political scientist Michael Dawson
describes as politically akin to “Swedish Social Democrats,” far to the
left of what passes for “liberal” in white American terms.

Our enemy is corporate capital, which has polluted every nook and cranny
of electoral and traditional Black politics. The Congressional Black
Caucus has been broken like an egg. Black institutions contort
themselves and their agendas to seek corporate funding. The corporate
media voice is a monotone, celebrating the rise of a “new” generation of
“Black leaders” that rejects confrontation with the powers-that-be and,
like Barack Obama, questions the relevance of race-based grievances.
That’s money talking. But we are a loud people, and our voices will be
heard.

Black Agenda Report executive editor Glen Ford can be reached at
Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.comThis email address is being protected
from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it.

______

Recommended: Louis Proyect, The Unrepentant Marxist

Tuesday, August 28th, 2007

http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/about-louis-proyect/

This is a great website, and highly recommended. Proyect has brilliant commentaries on a wide range of subjects.

William Kristol, a Fake Thug or a Real Thug?

Sunday, August 26th, 2007

08.25.07 — 4:10PM
By Steve Benen
Reading William Kristol’s latest screed in the Weekly Standard, one is tempted to pause and double-check the source. Is the content from a random right-wing blog, some nutty talk-radio show, or a leading DC establishment player in one of the most widely-read conservative political magazines in the country?

I naively thought I could no longer be surprised by Kristol’s columns, but his latest gem pushes the envelope to new depths. Did you know, for example, that American liberals were not only responsible for Khmer Rouge’s crimes, but our withdrawal from Vietnam also created the conditions for the Islamist revolution in Iran in 1979?

Kristol concludes:

[A]ll honor to George W. Bush for following in Reagan’s footsteps, grasping the nettle, and confronting the real lessons and consequences of Vietnam. The liberal media and the PC academics are horrified. All the better.

As the left shudders, Bush leads.

There isn’t even an argument to refute here; it’s just childish cheerleading and empty sloganeering.

A couple of months ago, Kevin Drum noted, “The Bill Kristol phenomenon is a stellar example of what a nice suit and a sober tone of voice can do for you…. [H]e’s smart enough to talk in more soothing tones. As a result, he gets columns in Time magazine, edits his own widely-read magazine, and shows up constantly on television.”

But with columns like these, Kristol’s penchant for “soothing tones” is gone. He’s just a sycophant, blithely touting a dangerous policy that doesn’t work, and bashing those who dare to disagree.

Does Kristol actually believe his own fluff? I’m inclined to think so, but as Jonathan Chait explained this week, it may not matter: “Kristol’s good standing in the Washington establishment depends on the wink-and-nod awareness that he’s too smart to believe his own agitprop. Perhaps so. But, in the end, a fake thug is not much better than the real thing.”

Defend Animal Rights!

Saturday, August 25th, 2007

Defend Animal Rights!
there has been a lot of justified criticism of late about dogfighting and the treatment of animals.

Stop dogfighting throughout the Americas!

Stop the torture and killing of dogs in Spain!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/1956951.stm

Condemn the novillada in Mexico and other bullfights worldwide:

Did You Know?

More than 40,000 bulls are slaughtered in rings in Spain each year, according to The New York Times, although most Spaniards would like bullfighting to end.
Before a bullfight, people will hit the bull on the head with bags of sand – for a long time and violently – to deprive the bull of his senses, according to The Washington Post.
A recent study found that 20 percent of bulls are fed laxatives and drugged before they step into the ring, according to the Associated Press.
Former bullfighters admit that bulls are intentionally debilitated with beatings to the kidneys and heavy weights hung around their necks for weeks before the fight, according to The Animals’ Voice.
Most of the time, bulls go into the arena blinded by the light because they are kept in darkness for 48 hours before the confrontation, according to the Brigitte Bardot Foundation.
Mexican bullfighting also includes novillada, or baby bullfights. Baby bulls, some no more than a few weeks old, are brought into arenas where they are stabbed to death by spectators, many of whom are children. These bloodbaths end with spectators’ cutting off the ears and tail of the often still conscious calf lying in his own blood.
Tourists, especially from the UK and America, keep bullfighting in business.

The Evil Within

Thursday, August 23rd, 2007

Why Cheney Really Is That Bad
By Scott Ritter
Truthdig.com
Tuesday 21 August 2007
…………………………………………..
Bush’s singular appeal has been the impression of
steadfastness in the eye of the storm, even if the
storm is for the most part self-created. For this we
must look not to “Bush’s Brain,” but instead peer
deep into the dark recesses of the White House,
where we can glimpse the awful “soul” of the
president-Dick Cheney.
The vice president is the single greatest threat to
American and international security in the world
today. Not Osama Bin Laden. Not the ghost of Saddam
Hussein. Not Ahmadinejad or Kim Jung Il. Not
al-Qaida, the Taliban, or Jose Padilla himself. Not
even George W. Bush can lay claim to this title. It
is Dick Cheney’s alone. Operating in a never-never
land of constitutional ambiguity which exists
between the office of the president and the Congress
of the United States, Cheney’s office has made its
impact felt on the policies of the United States of
America as had no vice president’s office before
him. Granted unprecedented oversight over national
security and foreign policy by executive order in
early 2001, many months prior to the terror attacks
of 9/11, Cheney has single-handedly steered America
away from being a nation among nations (albeit
superior), operating (roughly) in accordance with
the rule of law, and toward its present
manifestation as the new Rome, a decadent imperial
power bent on global domination whatever the cost.
The absolute worst of the rot that has infected
America because of the policies and actions of the
Bush administration has originated from the office
of the vice president. The nonsensical response to
the terror attacks of 9/11, seeking a “global war”
versus defending the rule of law at home and abroad,
taking the lead in spreading the lies that got us
involved in Iraq, legitimizing torture as a tool of
American jurisprudence, advocating for warrantless
wiretappings of U.S.-based communications
(regardless of what the Fourth Amendment says
against illegal search and seizure), and pushing for
an expansion of America’s global conflict into
Iran-all can be traced back to the person of Cheney
as the point of origin.
America today is very much engaged in a
life-or-death struggle against the forces of evil.
The enemy resides not abroad, however, but at home,
vested in the highest offices of the land. Neither
Osama Bin Laden nor Saddam Hussein threatened the
life blood of the United States-the Constitution-to
the extent that Cheney has. Not Hitler, Stalin, Mao
or Ho Chi Minh. Not since the American Civil War has
there been a constitutional crisis of the magnitude
that exists today, threatening to rip the very
fabric of American society apart at the seams,
courtesy of Dick Cheney.
That Congress today remains relatively mute on this
crisis is one of the great mysteries of our time.
Perhaps the vagaries of national politics can be
blamed. The Democratic majority in Congress appears
to have ceded its leadership role to unelected
presidential candidates who seem solely empowered to
comment on current events, domestic or foreign, and
who, out of fear of any misstep which could hurt
their chances to seize the White House as their own,
refuse to actually take a substantive stand against
the policies of the Bush administration. In an
effort that is curiously Rovian in the quest for
electoral victory, the Democratic candidates (with a
few notable exceptions) have been less than bold in
their opposition to the heinous policies that are
currently in place concerning Iraq, Iran, the war on
terror, torture and constitutional violations-unless
you count empty rhetoric.
In many ways, the leading Democrats, both those
running for office and those currently holding
office, are a far greater insult to American values
than the conservative standard-bearers for the
policies of Cheney. No one of substance takes
seriously the manic ranting of the
Hannity/Limbaugh/Coulter triad. These Democrats, on
the other hand, have mastered the art of compromise
to the point that they stand for nothing at all-this
at a time in American history when the policies of
the administration, derived from the dark abyss of
Bush’s soul, Cheney, provide the most concrete
example of what we as Americans should be standing
against.
The Democrats need to stand for something. Cheney
has provided the sort of political ammunition that
would enable them to fight, and win, a
constitutional battle over the heart of America, the
kind of defining struggle which I believe the vast
majority of Americans would rally around. Unless the
Democrats start separating themselves from the
policies of the Bush administration, and take an
active role in outing and suppressing the true evil
that is Dick Cheney, all they will achieve in the
coming years is a change in the titular political
orientation of America, without the kind of
deep-seated break from the failures and crimes of
the past six-plus years that have taken our nation,
and the world, right up to the edge of chaos.
“Bush’s Brain” may be gone, but his “Soul” lives on.
It is high time all of America put Dick Cheney fully
in the spotlight of collective accountability,
purging our nation of this scourge which has harmed
us in so many ways. If there is any case for
impeachment to be made against any member of the
Bush administration today, it can be made against a
vice president who has shamed our nation, destroyed
our moral standing and broken our laws.

__________________

WHITE HOUSE RALLY SQUADS!

Wednesday, August 22nd, 2007

Washington Post
Wednesday, August 22, 2007
White House Manual Details How to Deal With Protesters

By Peter Baker

Not that they’re worried or anything. But the White House evidently
leaves little to chance when it comes to protests within eyesight of the
president. As in, it doesn’t want any.

A White House manual that came to light recently gives presidential
advance staffers extensive instructions in the art of “deterring
potential protestors” from President Bush’s public appearances around
the country.

Among other things, any event must be open only to those with tickets
tightly controlled by organizers. Those entering must be screened in
case they are hiding secret signs. Any anti-Bush demonstrators who
manage to get in anyway should be shouted down by “rally squads”
stationed in strategic locations. And if that does not work, they should
be thrown out.

But that does not mean the White House is against dissent — just so
long as the president does not see it. In fact, the manual outlines a
specific system for those who disagree with the president to voice their
views. It directs the White House advance staff to ask local police “to
designate a protest area where demonstrators can be placed, preferably
not in the view of the event site or motorcade route.”

The “Presidential Advance Manual,” dated October 2002 with the stamp
“Sensitive — Do Not Copy,” was released under subpoena to the American
Civil Liberties Union as part of a lawsuit filed on behalf of two people
arrested for refusing to cover their anti-Bush T-shirts at a Fourth of
July speech at the West Virginia State Capitol in 2004. The techniques
described have become familiar over the 6 1/2 years of Bush’s
presidency, but the manual makes it clear how organized the anti-protest
policy really is.

The lawsuit was filed by Jeffery and Nicole Rank, who attended the
Charleston event wearing shirts with the word “Bush” crossed out on the
front; the back of his shirt said “Regime Change Starts at Home,” while
hers said “Love America, Hate Bush.” Members of the White House event
staff told them to cover their shirts or leave, according to the
lawsuit. They refused and were arrested, handcuffed and briefly jailed
before local authorities dropped the charges and apologized. The federal
government settled the First Amendment case last week for $80,000, but
with no admission of wrongdoing.

The manual demonstrates “that the White House has a policy of excluding
and/or attempting to squelch dissenting viewpoints from presidential
events,” said ACLU lawyer Jonathan Miller. “Individuals should have the
right to express their opinion to the president, even if it’s not a
favorable one.”

White House spokesman Tony Fratto said that he could not discuss the
manual because it is an issue in two other lawsuits.

The manual offers advance staffers and volunteers who help set up
presidential events guidelines for assembling crowds. Those invited into
a VIP section on or near the stage, for instance, must be ” extremely
supportive of the Administration,” it says. While the Secret Service
screens audiences only for possible threats, the manual says, volunteers
should examine people before they reach security checkpoints and look
out for signs. Make sure to look for “folded cloth signs,” it advises.

To counter any demonstrators who do get in, advance teams are told to
create “rally squads” of volunteers with large hand-held signs, placards
or banners with “favorable messages.” Squads should be placed in
strategic locations and “at least one squad should be ‘roaming’
throughout the perimeter of the event to look for potential problems,”
the manual says.

“These squads should be instructed always to look for demonstrators,” it
says. “The rally squad’s task is to use their signs and banners as
shields between the demonstrators and the main press platform. If the
demonstrators are yelling, rally squads can begin and lead supportive
chants to drown out the protestors (USA!, USA!, USA!). As a last resort,
security should remove the demonstrators from the event site.”

Advance teams are advised not to worry if protesters are not visible to
the president or cameras: “If it is determined that the media will not
see or hear them and that they pose no potential disruption to the
event, they can be ignored. On the other hand, if the group is carrying
signs, trying to shout down the President, or has the potential to cause
some greater disruption to the event, action needs to be taken
immediately to minimize the demonstrator’s effect.”

The manual adds in bold type: “Remember — avoid physical contact with
demonstrators! Most often, the demonstrators want a physical
confrontation. Do not fall into their trap!” And it suggests that
advance staff should “decide if the solution would cause more negative
publicity than if the demonstrators were simply left alone.”

The staff at the West Virginia event may have missed that line.