Archive for October, 2006

US Corporations Opposing New Rights for Chinese Workers

Sunday, October 15th, 2006

Published on Friday, October 13, 2006 by CommonDreams.org
US Corporations Are Opposing New Rights for Chinese Workers
by Jeremy Brecher, Tim Costello and Brendan Smith

The New York Times reported on its front page today that US-based corporations are fighting a proposed Chinese law that seeks to protect workers’ rights. The law is “setting off a battle with American and other foreign corporations that have lobbied against it by hinting that they may build fewer factories here.”

The Times reports that Global Labor Strategies, a group that supports labor rights policies, is releasing a report in New York and Boston “denouncing American corporations for opposing legislation that would give Chinese workers stronger rights.”

“‘You have big corporations opposing basically modest reforms,” said Tim Costello, an official of the group and a longtime labor union advocate. “This flies in the face of the idea that globalization and corporations will raise standards around the world.’”

The Times article drew heavily on the Global Labor Strategies report (.pdf), Beyond the Great Wall: U.S. Corporations Opposing New Rights for Chinese Workers which was released today. (The Spanish translation is available here.)

According to the report, US-based global corporations like Wal-Mart, Google, UPS, Microsoft, Nike, AT&T, and Intel, acting through US business organizations like the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai and the US-China Business Council, are actively lobbying against the new labor legislation. They are also threatening that foreign corporations will withdraw from China if it is passed.

China’s Draft Labor Contract Law would provide minimal standards that are commonplace in many other countries, such as enforceable labor contracts, severance pay regulations, and negotiations over workplace policies and procedures. The Chinese government is supporting these reforms in part as a response to rising labor discontent.

Corporate opposition to the law is designed to maintain the status quo in Chinese labor relations. This includes low wages, extreme poverty, denial of basic rights and minimum standards, lack of health and safety protections, and an absence of any legal contract for many employees.

According to Beyond the Great Wall, the proposed legislation will not eliminate Chinese labor problems. It will not provide Chinese workers with the right to independent trade unions with leaders of their own choosing and the right to strike. But foreign corporations are attacking the legislation not because it provides workers too little protection, but because it provides them too much. Indeed, the proposed law may well encourage workers to organize to demand the enforcement of the rights it offers.

This corporate campaign contradicts the justifications that have been given for public policies that encourage corporations to invest in China. US based corporations have repeatedly argued that they are raising human and labor rights standards abroad. For example, the American Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong asserts among its “universal principles” that “American business plays an important role as a catalyst for positive social change by promoting human welfare and guaranteeing to uphold the dignity of the worker and set positive examples for their remuneration, treatment, health and safety.” But US based corporations are trying to block legislation designed to improve the remuneration, treatment, health and safety, and other standards of Chinese workers.

At a time when China exerts a growing impact on the global economy, efforts to improve the conditions of Chinese workers are profoundly important for workers everywhere. As U.S. wages stagnate, many Americans worry that low wages and labor standards in China are driving down those in America. Improving labor conditions in China can help workers in the rest of the world resist a “race to the bottom” that threatens to bring wages and conditions worldwide down to the level of the least protected. The opposition of corporations to minimum standards for Chinese workers should be of concern to workers and their political and trade union representatives throughout the world.

Tim Costello, Jeremy Brecher and Brendan Smith are the co-founders of Global Labor Strategies, a resource center providing research and analysis on globalization, trade and labor issues. GLS staff have published many previous reports on a variety of labor-related issues, including Outsource This! American Workers, the Jobs Deficit, and the Fair Globalization Solution, Contingent Workers Fight For Fairness, and Fight Where You Stand!: Why Globalization Matters in Your Community and Workplace. They have also written and produced the Emmy-nominated PBS documentary Global Village or Global Pillage? GLS has offices in New York, Boston, and Montevideo, Uruguay. For more on GLS visit: www.laborstrategies.blogs.com or email smithb28@gmail.com.

Know Who is Funding the Right Wing Propaganda

Saturday, October 7th, 2006

Right Wing Organizations

For over 25 years, People For the American Way Foundation (PFAWF) has countered the Right Wing’s efforts to roll back, or stop, social justice progress and to reshape government and society to its liking. Our research center monitors the power of right-wing groups, documenting their connections, funding, and reporting on their political influence.

Right-wing organizations come in all shapes and sizes, from think tanks to legal groups, local and national lobbying organizations, foundations and media forums. At any given moment, the Right is at work in our public school systems, courthouses, in Congress and state assemblies. At the same time, right-wing groups are reaching huge audiences through media outlets they own or influence—promoting regressive policies that seek to drive wedges between and among Americans.

These often single-issue groups have the ability to create multi-issue networks that can respond on a wide range of issues. People For the American Way Foundation’s library has files on over 800 groups and almost 300 individuals documenting their activities and providing information about their efforts to reshape society. This section presents a small portion of that information.

Accuracy in Academia
African-American Life Alliance
All Children Matter Inc.
Alliance Defense Fund
American Center for Law and Justice
American Conservative Union
American Enterprise Institute
American Family Association
American Legislative Exchange Council
American Life League
Americans for Tax Reform
Bradley Foundation, Lynde and Harry
Campaign for Working Families PAC
Cato Institute
Center for the Study of Popular Culture
Christian Coalition of America
Club for Growth
Collegiate Network
Committee for Justice
Concerned Women for America
Eagle Forum
Eagle Forum Collegians
Family Research Council
Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies
Focus on the Family
FRCAction
Free Congress Research and Education Foundation
Heritage Foundation
Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace
Independent Women’s Forum
Institute for Justice
Intercollegiate Studies Institute
Leadership Institute
Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research
Madison Project
National Association of Scholars
National Center for Policy Analysis
National Right to Life Committee
National Taxpayers Union
State Policy Network
Students for Academic Freedom
Traditional Values Coalition
Young America’s Foundation

Accuracy in Academia

4455 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 330
Washington, DC 20008
www.academia.org

International Journal of Progressive Education, Special Issue

Saturday, October 7th, 2006

UNDERSTANDING CRITICAL PEDAGOGY AND PETER McLAREN IN THE AGE OF GLOBAL CAPITALISM

PDF

International Journal of Progressive Education
Volume 2, Number 3:
October, 2006

Editorial Statement (English): Understanding Critical Pedagogy and Peter McLaren in the Age of Global Capitalism
Eryaman, Mustafa Yunus

Interfering with Capitalism’s Spell: Peter McLaren’s Revolutionary Liminality (English)

Fassbinder, Samuel Day

Imagining the Impossible: Revolutionary Critical Pedagogy Against the 21st Century American Imperium (English)

Scatamburlo-D’Annibale, Valerie

Critical Pedagogy as Collective Social Expertise in Higher Education (English)

Suoranta, Juha & Moisio, Olli-Pekka

Remaking Critical Pedagogy: Peter McLaren’s Contribution to a Collective Work (English)

Martin, Gregory

The Possibilities of Transformation: Critical Research and Peter McLaren
Porfilio, Brad J.

Peter McLaren & the 3 R’s: Reflection, Resistance and Revolution (English)

Gabbard, David

The Secret Downing Street Memo and the Politics of Truth: A Performance Text (English)

Denzin, Norman K.

Interview

An Interview with Peter McLaren: Comments on the State of the World-2005 (English)
Shaughnessy, Michael F.

Book Review
McLaren, Peter & Farahmandpur, Ramin (2005). Teaching against Global Capitalism and the New Imperialism: A Critical Pedagogy. Lanham, Maryland, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. (Chinese)

Junrui Chang & Changyong Yang

New Issue of Ethnicities is now published.

Saturday, October 7th, 2006

Contents: September 1 2006, Volume 6, No. 3

Peter McLaren and Nathalia E. Jaramillo
Guest Editorial: Juntos en la Lucha
Ethnicities 2006 6: 283-296. [PDF] [References]

Patricia Hill Collins
New Commodities, New Consumers: Selling Blackness in a Global Marketplace
Ethnicities 2006 6: 297-317. [Abstract] [PDF] [References]

David Gillborn
Rethinking White Supremacy: Who Counts in ‘WhiteWorld’
Ethnicities 2006 6: 318-340. [Abstract] [PDF] [References]

Shahrzad Mojab
In the Quagmires of Ethnicity: A Marxist Critique of Liberal ‘Exit Strategies’
Ethnicities 2006 6: 341-361. [Abstract] [PDF] [References]

Himani Bannerji
Making India Hindu and Male: Cultural Nationalism and the Emergence of the Ethnic Citizen in Contemporary India
Ethnicities 2006 6: 362-390. [Abstract] [PDF] [References]

E. San Juan, Jr
Ethnic Identity and Popular Sovereignty: Notes on the Moro Struggle in the Philippines
Ethnicities 2006 6: 391-422. [Abstract] [PDF] [References]

Martha E. Gimenez
With a Little class: A Critique of Identity Politics
Ethnicities 2006 6: 423-439. [Abstract] [PDF] [References]