|
|
Name:David O. Dickson
Background:
The Superintendent is from northwest Indiana, and is the former Superintendent in Hobart,
Indiana, and a former teacher in Gary Indiana - was a union member and building representative in
Gary.
Tenure: 14 years
Management team:
The Superintendent has a cabinet composed of Assistant Superintendents for Personnel,
Curriculum, Finance, Pupil Personnel, and Leadership. Also, the Labor Relations Counsel is a
member. The President of the Union meets with the cabinet on a regular basis, and also brings
teachers to the meetings. The purpose of the cabinet is to problem solve, and identify professional
concerns.
Other employee unions(Name, approximate unit membership, relationship to teachers)
Hammond has approximately 17 unions representing workers in the district. Teamsters represent
truck drivers and bus drivers, steel workers represent the custodial force, AFL-CIO Skilled Trades
unions represent various trades, the Secretaries are represented by an unaffiliated local union and
the Paraprofessionals are unorganized.
The HTF meets once per year with the other district unions. The Unions discuss their priorities
for the year. Annually, none of the unions settle salary until the HTF does. The unions coordinate
bargaining. The unions also collaborate on political activity including school board and Indiana
general assembly.
Status of contract: (Attachment 1)
Expiration of current agreement:2001 (December 31)
|
|
|
|
|
Agency fee: Yes
Binding arbitration:
Yes - The Union arbitrates approximately one grievance per year. Most of the arbitrations are over
dismissal.
Approximate number of grievances per year:
Approximately 3-4 grievances a year. The union successfully solves hundreds of problems per
year, without the need to file a grievance
Strikes:No strikes in the recent past - there was a strike in 1970.
Unfair labor practices:
A ULP was filed against both the Union and the Board for collaboration in the denial of a
sabbatical. The Union and District prevailed. A group of school nurses has recently filed a ULP
against the Union for failure to represent. These personnel are not in the bargaining unit, so the
ULP cannot be successful, as only bargaining unit members can allege failure to represent.
|
|
|