GSE&IS Facilities Space Allocation Policy
This policy statement is intended to guide space allocation decisions in GSE&IS.
The draft was developed by the School Space Sub-Committee: James Catterall, Sol
Cohen, Phil Ender and Cary Whitcup. The draft was reviewed and revised by the
full School Space Committee consisting of Helen Astin, Christine Borgman, Mike
Casillas, James Catterall, Sol Cohen, Phil Ender (Chair), Harold Levine, Leah
Lievrouw, Beverly Lynch, Deborah Stipek and Cary Whitcup.
What do we need space for? The first task undertaken by the subcommittee
was to identify the spectrum of School space needs. The following scheme resulted:
Space is used for:
regular faculty offices
emeriti faculty
school and departmental administrative personnel
students
staff
research projects
instruction
meetings
external/service units
storage
What are our priorities for allocating space to these needs?
The subcommittee recommends that GSE&IS consider space needs in two
clusters:
- Cluster I. Research and degree programs involving regular GSE&IS ladder
faculty, along with associated administrative and staff support for these functions.
- Cluster II. Service and Outreach activities, along with associated
administration and staff.
It is clear that while both clusters represent important centers of activity in
the School, Cluster I is regarded widely as highest priority within the mission of the
school. Therefore, Cluster I activities should have priority claims on available
space.
Having identified two major clusters of GSE&IS activities with needs for
on-campus space, the subcommittee recommends some First Principles that should
guide actual space allocation decisions. These are the principles that should be
invoked when choices among alternative space allocations must be made. We
suggest that space decisions and choices be examined in light of these principles, and
that decisions be reached through deliberation that explicitly takes into account their
implications vis a' vis these principles. We suggest no formulaic way to approach
space decisions, nor do we think that one is possible or advisable.
First Principles to Consider in Allocating GSE&IS
Facilities Space
1. Highest Priority Should be Given to Activities Which:
- are directly connected to the Cluster I activities of GSE&IS.
- involve the active participation of GSE&IS ladder faculty.
- involve the active participation of GSE&IS degree program students.
2. High Priority Should be Given to Activities Which Also:
- result in the generation of overhead.
- need to interact with other campus units (and therefore should not be located off
campus).
- result in improved ratings in the annual U.S. News and World Report survey.
3. Priority Should be Given to Activities Which:
- are directly connected to the Cluster II activities of GSE&IS.
4. Special Consideration for Full-time Staff:
- Consideration in workspace allocation and work environment should be given to
GSE&IS personnel who work on campus full-time.
5. Lowest Priority Should be Given to Activities Which:
- are not easily classified into either Cluster I or Cluster II functions.
Additional Guidelines and Recommendations:
The following guidelines and recommendations should be followed in
determining space needs and in reaching allocation decisions.
Guidelines:
- New projects/proposals must be accompanied by a space impact report which
includes an analysis of off-campus space possibilities and the impact of an
off-campus location on the viability of the proposal.
- Funded research projects are eligible for:
- 1 desk for each full-time professional staff member.
- 1-desk for each research assistant FTE.
- Funded research projects should review their space needs at least once annually (a
simple space audit form could be developed) and make available space to
other purposes whenever possible and consistent with grant requirements.
Recommendations:
- GSE&IS should create a pool of desk space, allocated to divisions/ departments for
doctoral students on a pro-rata full time student basis.
- GSE&IS should acquire and maintain a quality off-campus center that would offer
facilities possibilities for present and future projects; such a center would be
more integrated into the activities of the School than would the sum of
haphazardly developed satellite spaces. This recommendation is based on a
presumption that Grow and add we must! and that on-campus space will
remain limited.
- GSE&IS should retain on-campus flexible space that can be put to other uses
during summers, quarter breaks, etc.
- To free up classrooms, the School should encourage small classes, say with five or
fewer students, to meet in faculty offices or other suitable space.(In the spirit
of RCM, this of course means that faculty could rent-back their offices to the
chair!)
- Divisional/departmental support staff, e.g., AA's, should be assigned to shared or
reception type space.
- The School should develop inducements to encourage faculty to share offices.
- Faculty with cross-campus appointments greater than half-time and who have
offices in other buildings should be asked to share their office at GSE&IS or
make their office available for use by others on some pro-rata basis. (Faculty
would be guaranteed the right of return to their offices when their
School/Departmental appointments end.)
- Faculty with School/Departmental administrative assignments and who are
allocated an administrative office within the School, will be asked to make
their faculty office available for other uses. (Faculty would be guaranteed the
right of return to their regular office when their administrative appointment
ends.)
- Tenured faculty should be assigned private (single) offices. The square footage will
generally be between 130 to 200 square feet. A faculty member may
voluntarily choose an office smaller than 130 square feet, but will not be
assigned such an office. Faculty who occupy offices in Moore Hall in excess of
225 square feet will retain their offices until such time as they retire or leaave
the School. At that juncture, the offices may be assigned as seminar space,
shared space, or re-configured into smaller private offices.
- Upon retirement, faculty will be asked to vacate their regular office unless they are
on continuous recall (see below). Emeriti will be assigned desk space in the
Emeriti suite, if desired. Faculty recalled to teach will be assigned office space
(see temporary faculty section).
- Faculty who are recalled within 1 quarter or less of their retirement date and
maintain continuous recall (that is for each of the three quarters) may remain
in their present offices for up to two years. This commitment may be
renewed based on availability of space. Faculty who are recalled to service as
principal investigators of research projects will be assigned shared office space.
- Full-time visiting faculty, full-time lecturers, emeriti on recall status to teach
should be assigned shared office space depending on availability.
- Post doctoral fellows, visiting scholars and part-time faculty should be assigned
desk space or shared office space depending on availability.
SUMMARY OF SPACE ALLOCATIONS
| Ladder/Tenured Faculty | Private Office | 130-200 sq. ft. |
| Adjunct Faculty (full-time) | Private Office | 130-200 sq. ft. |
| Faculty with other offices | Shared Office | 60-110 sq. ft. |
| Emeriti (not on pay status) | Emeriti Office | 60 sq. ft. |
| Emeriti (recalled within 1 qtr*) | Private Office | 130-200 sq. ft. |
| Emeriti (recalled,
break-in-service) | Shared Office | 60 sq. ft. |
| Visiting Faculty | Shared Office | 60 sq. ft. |
| Lecturers (full-time) | Shared Office | 60 sq. ft. |
| Lecturers (part-time) | Desk Space | |
| Visiting Scholars (full-time) | Desk Space | |
| Postdoctoral Fellows | Desk Space | |
*and on continuous service
UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies
pbe: 11Sep96
updated