| |
 |
|
(JavaScript Error)
|
| Archives |
|
|
|
|
Subscribe
|
| Now you
can subscribe to this blog and receive new blogs direct to
your email! |
|
RSS/XML Syndication
| |
|
|
|
|
Video: Alternative
Views
|
|
Censured Casualties
features rare footage
of war crimes against the Iraqi people suffered during
and after the Gulf War. The footage is from former Attorney
General Ramsey
Clark in his attempt to document the injustice
of United States military actions in the region.
|
|
|
Video: Alternative
Views
|
|
Another Unknown
War
features a film on the
struggle of the indigenous people of West Papua to remain
sovereign in the face of an Indonesian invasion backed
by world capital. Footage of Noam
Chomsky on Western involvments in the region and
the relation to East Timor.
|
|
|
Doug's New Books & Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TV/Radio
|
|
|
| |
 |
| |
|
|
|
Friday, May 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
journalists
James Baker deserves much more media focus as this commentary suggests
journalists
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thursday, May 30, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, May 29, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
President Formally Seeks a Halt to Crusader Artillery System
President Formally Seeks a Halt to Crusader Artillery System
The Crusader story is extremely interesting and it appears to me that the Bush administration pulled off a scam for the Bush family Carlyle Funds that so far has alluded attention. To everyone’s surprise, Donald Rumfeld initially supported the oversized and outdated Crusader artillery canon that critics claimed was overpriced and more appropriate to earlier models of war. Bush himself had criticized the system during the 2000 election and Rumsfeld had earlier also opposed the Crusader. With Rumsfeld’s seeming support, the Carlyle group put out an IPO (i.e. initial stock offering) of the company that made the Crusader that soared in value. They then dumped big chunks of the stock and lo and behold! Rumsfeld was now against the system in a fierce fight with Pentagon army bureaucrats who wanted it, including the highly disgraced Secretary of the Army Thomas White whose Enron sins were creating a fire-storm of criticism. Bush jumped in and declared himself against the Crusader, no doubt thinking that he could claim he was both for a high-tech military and was not a shill for family interests, although his Carlyle group associates had already pocketed their profits from the scam!
|
|
|
The New Republic Online: Memogate
Is the CIA or FBI responsible for 911 intelligence failures?
Answer, its all of them...
below, NR goes after CIA
The New Republic Online: Memogate
|
|
|
Halliburton Says S.E.C. Is Investigating Its Accounting
Potentially explosive! Last week I posted a NYT story that indicated that Halliburton had cooked the books when Cheney was CEO and the story is now breaking that Halliburton is under investigation. Most mainstream accounts fail to note that Cheney received a $33 million severance pay when he left Halliburton to run with Bush and then has repaid the payoff with a variety of federal favors for Halliburton. Cheney is crude con big-time and its to be hoped that this story will lead to his undoing...
Halliburton Says S.E.C. Is Investigating Its Accounting
|
|
|
Alternewswire
click away on good alternative news webwire...
Alternewswire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, May 28, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The New Yorker: Fact
Seymour Hersh, top investigative report, on why government didn't know it was coming...
The New Yorker: Fact
|
|
Monday, May 27, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
Enron, the S&L Scandal, and the Bush Gang
The Enron collapse is a major political and economic scandal, one of the defining events of the epoch. In fact, it is amazing that George W. Bush has been caught up in three defining spectacles of the Third Millennium, events that are among the most stunning in U.S. history and that happened within a single year: the stealing of a presidential election in Grand Theft 2000, September 11 and subsequent Terror War, and the collapse of Enron and uncovering of its scandalous history. The Enron scandals are especially important since they reveal the complete failure and catastrophic effects of Bushonomics, the amazingly scandalous history of Bush and his partners in corruption and crime, and the systemic failures of a system that would allow Enron and Bush and his cronies to flourish, loot the system in startling ways, and assume the very pinnacle of economic and political power.
It is clear that the Enron scandals reveal the utter unworkability and dangerous consequences of the Reagan-Bush conservative pro-market economic policy that deregulates the economy, allows a Wild West capitalism to flourish, and that eliminates regulation, law, and accountability in the economic realm, while placing the state in the service of the most corrupt and greedy corporations. As Governor of Texas and President of the United States, George W. Bush and his associates had done everything possible to deregulate oil and energy corporations and to provide windfall tax benefits and other financial favors to his corporate and wealthy supporters. Hence, Enron, for instance, not only did not have to pay taxes, but also got back millions in rebates. Laws and regulations governing banking and accountability of corporations were thrown out the window and the way was open for Enron and Wild West capital to loot the system and undermine the economy with substantial payoffs to the Bush administration and other politicians to look the other way and aid and abet the corporate theft.
A similar looting of the system had taken place earlier and the same cast of characters had been involved in a previous scandal: I am referring to the Savings and Loan scam of the 1980s Reagan and Bush administrations where banking, savings and loan, and other financial institutions had been deregulated and multitudes of corporate crooks stepped in and robbed the financial system, costing taxpayers, according to some estimates, over $500 billion (Lewis 1990) to over $1 3 trillion (Day 1993). In a way, this systematic corporate crime bonanza was bigger than the Enron robbery and the perpetrators largely got away with it. The S&L thievery surely should have alerted government and corporate officials that deregulation and laissez-faire policy is extremely dangerous and opens the doors to large-scale corruption and crime.
The S&L scandal should have also alerted politicians, the media, and the public to the sort of scam and corruption that the Bush family has engaged in for generations. Architects of the S&L deregulation policy included former Vice-President George H. W. Bush and James Baker who had served as Reagan’s chief of staff and Treasury Secretary, among other offices in an astounding career that has so far escaped wide-spread public scrutiny. A book by former Houston Post reporter Pete Brewton (1992), however, documents how friends and family members of the Bush and Baker family, as well as the Mafia and CIA, took over S&L institutions, looted them, and left the public with the bill.
The slime, scandal, and crimes of the S&L looting and Enron debacle are in some ways similar. After Bush family deregulation carried out by the father and son, the scammers of the S&Ls and Enron crooks went on an orgy of corruption, taking out funds from the S&Ls, for example, and investing them in a variety of schemes and scams that enabled the S&L managers, such as Neil Bush, to skim off big bucks for themselves and their cronies. Enron, as we are now seeing, set up dummy businesses for their con operations, to hide money, to avoid taxes, to use the firms to hide debt, and to inflate the value of their stock prices. As the scandal unfolds, no doubt other inventive business maneuvers will come to light.
Both the S&L institutions and Enron threw money at politicians as they scammed the system, making sure that they had political friends in high places. The corporate players in the respective crimes spent money outrageously to buy friends and supporters, ranging from lavish entertainment, often including prostitutes, booze, and drugs, to purchases of a wide range of goods and services that bought good-will and kept money flowing (many Enron creditors, as were shown nightly on television for some weeks, were left with outstanding bills for products and services rendered, that could bankrupt many small businesses). And Enron even bought journalists and intellectuals, paying them outrageously high fees to speak or consult with the corporation.
Not only does the Enron debacle show that the kind of Wild West capitalism that George W. Bush and his cronies advocate does not work, but it also reveals the appalling connections and histories of the Bush family, especially if seen in connection with the S&L scandal. Enron-Bush connections are multiple, beginning with a history of favors to the Texas-based energy corporation from successive Bush administrations, in George H. W. Bush’s presidency, in George W. Bush’s two terms as governor of Texas, and in his short but eventful term as President. While in Texas, Bush pushed through the Enron agenda by creating the most deregulatory environment imaginable, where the energy companies had almost no state regulation or requirements, to the detriment of the state’s environment, economy, and eventually to the people of Texas who had to pay for the Bush-Enron excesses –- indeed, given the collapse of Enron stock and the large number of investors who lost billions, the entire country had to pay for Bushonomics and the shenanigans of his supporters, friends, and cronies.
The epic story of Dick Cheney, oil, and Enron is similarly mind-boggling. Cheney admittedly met with Enron executives six times while developing energy, tax, and economic policy. Moreover, there are allegations that Cheney replaced the head of the energy department regulation, FERC, Curtis Hubert with Patrick H. Wood, a crony of George W. Bush’s from Texas who was previously had of the Texas Public Utilities Commission and who would be more pliable to Enron’s demands. For months now, there have been demands that Cheney hand over notes and documents pertaining to his Enron meetings, but so far he has stone-walled these requests, opening the way to potential Senate Hearings or Trials that will perhaps provide a media spectacle equivalent to Watergate, or maybe even better.
The entire Bush administration is, in fact, saturated with oil and energy connections and ties to Enron. Cheney, national security advisor Condoleezza Rice, Commerce Secretary and former Bush campaign manager Don Evans, Bush administration economic advisor Lawrence Lindsay, and many others in the Bush administration come straight from the oil and energy industries. Moreover, Cheney, Evans, Lindsay and others have close Enron connections and were engaged in conversations with Lay and other top Enron officials during its collapse. John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney General, has had to recuse himself from the Enron investigations because of campaign contributions from Enron and close connections with the corporation, as have other top Justice Department officials. Texas Senator Phil Gramm helped write the rules that deregulated energy production and enabled Enron to create its off-shore entities, avoiding public scrutiny and tax liabilities, Gramm’s wife Wendy had served on Enron’s corporate board, and both Gramms received bundles from Enron (perhaps leading Phil Gramm to decide not to run for re-election, knowing that he’d excessively scammed the tainted Enron money box).
Bush’s top policy advisor, Karl Rove, always on the take and on the make, had major stock investments in Enron, which he was forced to sell when reports leaked out that Rove owned large blocks of stock in Enron, Dell computers, tobacco firms, and other corporations which had pending government business and demands. Rove reportedly sold the stock but continued to provide lavish favors to those who contributed to Bush campaigns. It was also leaked to the press on January 26 that Rove had recommended to Enron Christian fundamentalist leader Ralph Reed, who was employed for years with the corporation. Rove wanted Reed’s support, which he got, for Bush’s run for the presidency in the year 2000, but did not want Reed directly on Bush’s staff as the plan was to package Bush as a moderate “compassionate conservative,” and not a hardright Christian fundamentalist a la Reed.
Top Enron lobbyists had close connections with the Bush administration and the Army Secretary, Thomas E. White, who Bush appointed to bring corporate management skills to the military, came from Enron. White is a typical representative of the “revolving door” from the public to the private sector and back, and a posterboy for Bush-Enron connections. While Army Secretary, White had been pushing privatizing energy production for military bases, a move that would immensely benefit Enron. He also held onto his Enron stocks, although he was supposed to divest, and was getting caught up in a web of scandal that would probably force his resignation.
And so the Bush administration is caught up from head to toe in an economic scandal that could be bigger than Teapot Dome in the 1920s and a political scandal larger than Watergate. The Bush administration strategy has been to claim that Enron is an economic affair and not a political one, but in terms of policies and players the economic and political overlap with Bush administration policies and personnel front and center. While millions of people will be seriously harmed by the Enron/Bush scandals, and perhaps the economy will be weakened, one gazes in amazement at the scale of the corruption and crime. The Enron-Bush scandals bog the imagination in immensity and scale and no doubt we’ve only seen the tip of the iceberg. It will be interesting to see if, once again, George W. Bush will escape the taint of scandal and political destruction. Or will the Bushgate flood open in a spectacle that will keep the public entertained and the media chattering class, lawyers, and judges busy for years to come?
|
|
|
Bush not getting enough sleep, gets crabby and mean according to AP
washingtonpost.com
Travel, Late Night Take Toll on Bush
By Ron Fournier
AP White House Correspondent
Sunday, May 26, 2002; 6:21 PM
PARIS –– Maybe it was the late night out. Maybe the long flights.
Whatever the cause, it was a tired President Bush who stood at a news conference podium Sunday alongside the much more animated – and talkative – French President Jacques Chirac.
Bush responded testily to a question about anti-American sentiment and was a bit crabby around his staff.
No wonder.
Bush, who likes to go to bed about 9:30 p.m., was up past midnight Saturday night on a cruise with Russian President Vladimir Putin in St. Petersburg, Russia. Then it was up in the morning for visits to a church and synagogue before flying to Paris – his fourth city and third country in five days.
So when a reporter posed a three-part question, Bush answered one part and forgot the rest.
"I'm jet-lagged," he said.
Reminded of the other two questions, Bush offered another explanation for the memory lapse.
"That's what happens when you're over 55," he said.
He turns 56 in July.
–––
It wasn't exactly what an overtired president needed at the moment.
Chirac opened the news conference with an 11-minute statement – an eternity by U.S. presidential news conference standards. He reviewed, one by one, the points they had discussed privately. There was terrorism, Russia, NATO, the U.S. farm b
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sunday, May 26, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saturday, May 25, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Argument
Bush held in well-deserved contempt by intelligent critics
Independent Argument
|
|
|
Stock Adviser Knew About 9/11 Attacks, U.S. Suggests
What is this about?! There were reports right after 911 that there were a lot of suspicious stock purchases and selling before and up to 9/11 that led to suspicions that the terrorists were playing the market.... then reports that German bank with CIA connections had done some funny trading... then story disappeared from mainstream... and now this.... inquiring minds want to know...
Stock Adviser Knew About 9/11 Attacks, U.S. Suggests
|
|
Friday, May 24, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
Bush Administration and FBI/CIA Responsibility for September 11 Terror Attacks
Different pundits and critics blame different fractions of the U.S. government for failing to prevent the September 11 attack, with some going after the FBI, others the CIA, and others either the Clinton or Bush administration -– or a combination thereof. Republicans and rightwingers continue to blame the Clinton administration, while serious questions are now being raised concerning Bush administration policy failures that made possible the September 11 terror attacks. I would argue that the collective failure is that of both the Bush administration as a whole and the national security apparatus, in particular the FBI and CIA. The Bush administration is responsible for failing to organize an anti-terrorist task force to coordinate information and action, cutting back on efforts that the Clinton administration had made in this direction, and ignoring government reports that highlighted the need to organize the government to better deal with terrorism, while failing to respond to a large number of specific warnings about impending al Qaeda attacks from a wealth of sources.
Of course, failures of specific intelligence agencies are also in question, as well as the issue of coordinating information between the CIA, FBI, and other agencies. In particular, as Congress began hearings into FBI failures in May 2002 after revelations of the failure of the agency to respond to the Phoenix Arizona FBI memos concerning potential Osama bin Laden al Qaeda terrorists taking flight lessons and the arrest in Minnesota of a potential hijacker, Zacarias Moussaouri, who had alleged al Qaeda connections, shocking revelations of FBI bureaucratic inertia and failure to respond to local intelligence reports, to coordinate information with the CIA, and in general to provide adequate analysis and actions, were being aired in the media. For instance, a FBI operative in the Minnesota office sent Congress a 13-page letter to the Congressional committee that is investigating the government’s lack of preparedness for the September 11 attacks, which documented frustration with the FBI bureaucracy’s inability to respond to serious concerns about an imminent terrorist attack and to get the agency to investigate potential al Qaeda terrorists more seriously.
Indeed, reading media reports or testimony of FBI and CIA bureaucracy inability to properly interpret intelligence reports from the field concerning dangers of a pending al Qaeda terrorist attack, the lack of information sharing between the FBI, CIA, and other intelligence agencies, and the Bush administration disinterest in addressing these problems pre-September 11 is shocking. It is clear that the FBI, CIA, and U.S. government is mired in bureaucracy and that the national security apparatus needs to be completely reorganized. Obviously, there should be blue-ribbon investigations of exactly what went wrong and why. But it is the responsibility of the sitting political administration to protect the country and in the case of September 11 the Bush administration failed in multiple ways.
[the recent news stories that prompted this commentary are posted in the following]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Tied to Terror Suspect Gave F.B.I. Disturbing Portrait
An accompanying NYT disturbing story that raises questions concerning FBI incompetency in detailing with terrorist threats. Just yesterday, I saw an eye-opening 1987 British Granada TV documentary "The Sword of Islam" that -- almost 15 years ago -- documented the growing radical Islamic movement, hatred of the West, and embrace of terrorism. People within US government agencies should have known of this growing threat and dealt with it, it is stunning how the FBI and US government agencies ignored the threat. Equally disturbing are reports of Bush administration shutting down efforts by the Clinton administration to address the terrorist threats; I comment in my next posting on the issue of responsibility.
Student Tied to Terror Suspect Gave F.B.I. Disturbing Portrait
|
|
|
Agent Complaints Lead F.B.I. Director to Ask for Inquiry
This story contains explosive revelations of utter FBI incompetency in dealing with impending threats of possible al Qaeda attacks; an agent from the Minneapolis FBI office details problems so severe that there should be serious consideration of reorganizing the FBI and perhaps shutting it down and reorganizing it from bottom up as the WTO recently decided to do.
Agent Complaints Lead F.B.I. Director to Ask for Inquiry
|
|
Wednesday, May 22, 2002
|
|
| |
