Center for Information as Evidence
UCLA Department of Information Studies
Objectives
The primary goals of the Center for Information as Evidence are:
To create a discourse around notions of information as evidence that articulate and expand upon this as an area of study
To promote interdisciplinary approaches to the study of information as evidence by facilitating collaborations that bridge theory and practice, and cross the academy, government, industry, and community
To monitor relevant local and global issues relating to record-keeping, accountability and rights
To sponsor relevant outreach and dissemination activities and research forums
CIE accomplishes these goals through its investigation of three interrelated components described in detail below: Accountability, Advocacy (both as evidence-related processes), and Artifacts (as evidence-bearing products). Axiomatic concepts that cut across these themes include legitimacy, power, authority, authenticity, literacy, classification, preservation, and sociopolitical context.
Accountability: Records, statistics, and other kinds of documents and data are created, used, and preserved in order to ensure that government, business, medical, educational, research and many other kinds of organizations and programs are conducting their activities in a reliable, appropriate, and effective manner. Such accountability is often legally required and is essential to maintain the trust of those to whom organizations are accountable, such as taxpayers, shareholders, funding agencies, and patients. In an increasingly digital world, electronic recordkeeping, communications, and data collection and analysis raise significant new issues and challenges for ensuring accountability.
Advocacy: Documents, records and recordkeeping systems and traditions serve as witnesses to all the major events of our lives. They can serve as collective memory, document our identities and ensure that our rights can be established and secured. These same records, however, can also be used as instruments of oppression by the state or other governing institutions. Different communities have different ways of keeping their records and transmitting their heritage, and these differences can result in power imbalances when two traditions come up against each other, for example, in legal actions, or in post-colonial settings.
Artifacts: Whether they are official documents or everyday objects, primary artifacts contain a wealth of information. Scholars in both the sciences and humanities must continually interrogate the best methods to extract and store that information for future use. This process raises difficult questions of consistency with regards to determining metadata and artifact preservation.
upcoming events
April 7 2007
NEW COLLOQUIUM SERIES :
INTERDISCIPLINARITY AND INFORMATION
Upcoming Panel:
The Human Body
April 7, 5:30 pm PT/8:30 ET
Moore Hall 3027
This talk will be streamed LIVE. To view the talk click here. Please note, this is a one-time, live viewing only and will NOT be available for screening posthumously.
If you are viewing these talks online, we would love to hear from you. Please send us an email telling us your name and your affiliation and whether you would like to be notified of CIE's future events and activities.
notable news
We are interested in gathering noteworthy news items that pertain to CIE's interests. If you have a web item that you would like to draw to our attention, please email us.
"Type in ‘Native American’ and Search (Someday) 13 Million Photos" March 12, 2008 (NY Times)
"Trying to Add a Pulse to a World of Machines" March 12, 2008 (NY Times)
"The Art of Listening" March 12, 2008 (NY Times)
"To Aim Ads, Web Is Keeping Closer Eye on You" March 10, 2008 (NY Times)
"Inflated art appraisals cost U.S. government untold millions" March 2, 2008 (LA Times)
"Agencies Share Information By Taking a Page From Wikipedia" January 28, 2008 (Washington Post)