A Digest from the
by Paula Zeszotarski
Introduction
Definitions
Importance
of Multicultural Curricula in Community Colleges
Multicultural Courses
Changes in the Overall Curriculum
Extracurricular Activities
Reinforcing the Foundations
Conclusion
Sources
Issues
of multiculturalism have generated changes in community college curricula in
both form and content. This Digest introduces some definitions of multiculturalism,
demonstrates why a multicultural curriculum is particularly important to community
colleges, and provides case studies to illustrate ways in which multiculturalism
is being incorporated into the curriculum and extra-curriculum.
The term
"multicultural" has generated considerable debate in educational circles. The
purpose of multicultural curricula is "to accommodate and respect the varied
cultural origins of our diverse population" (Eaton, 1997). Takaki (author of
A Different Mirror: A History of Multicultural America and professor of ethnic
studies for 20 years) defines the objectives of multicultural education: "The
multicultural class is the place where students can understand their larger
community, and figure out what it means to be an American. It is a place where
we study the question, How do our paths intersect?" (Reid, 1995).
Multicultural
courses are designed to enhance students' ability to function in an increasingly
diverse society and empower them as citizens who can make a difference. Goals
for student learning in multicultural courses include developing an appreciation
of the "knowledge traditions within the contemporary United States," providing
an understanding of the role of racial, cultural and ethnic differences in the
formation of our national identity, evaluating diverse views of the interrelationship
of self and community, exploring the individual students' own cultural heritage,
and developing the ability to read and compare cultures through their cultural
expressions (Olguin & Schmitz, 1997). Providing a curriculum which reflects
the experiences of a diverse population also helps in retaining traditionally
underrepresented student populations by providing a curriculum which is culturally
relevant (Reid, 1995). This is nowhere more important than in community
colleges which currently enroll 42% of all first time college students as wll
as 46% of all minority students in higher education (Foote, 1997).
The creation
of new courses is central to the process of including multicultural issues in
the curriculum. Rancho Santiago College in Santa Ana, California serves a community
which is largely Latino and Southeast Asian. A course entitled, "American
Pluralism in Microcosm: The City of Santa Ana as Text" proved to be an effective
means of increasing students' appreciation and respect for cultural diversity
in this community (Nixon et. al., 1997). Student teams that prepared reports
on the cultural expressions of the diverse populations in Santa Ana resulted
in increased interactions among students of different cultures. Students
exhibited creative responses to the assignment by producing thematic maps of
the city, videotapes on the city's history, and collages illustrating diversity
in religion, art, and other dimensions. Classroom discussion focused on questions
of what it means to be an American, what causes divisions, and what binds people
together. The basic idea of the course has been transplanted into various existing
courses and expanded to include other communities.
Overall changes to academic disciplines, departments, and degree programs are an equally important aspect of creating a multicultural curriculum. Fresno City College (FCC) has undertaken the development of a new American Studies discipline that will address issues of pluralism and identity. The first step in this process was the creation of a new course, "American Pluralism: The Search for the Common Ground." The college's American Pluralism and Identity Committee is presently working on integrating sections of American Literature, American History and Ethnic Studies into the new discipline (FCC, 1997).
Many FCC faculty reported that class discussions centered on the difficulty of defining a common American identity rather than on issues uniting our society. Others commented that our society was more divided by social class than by race, ethnicity, or gender. These discussions affirmed the importance of a continuing dialogue on diversity in the curriculum (FCC, 1997).
Itawamba
Community College (ICC) (Mississippi) has revised curricula across various disciplines
according to a framework of four questions: What does it mean to be American?
What divides us? What brings us together? What do we have in common? Students
consider these questions on a personal level as well as through academic materials.
For example, participants in the American Literature class applied these questions
to the works of Colonial and Renaissance period authors (ICC, 1997).
Concern for multicultural issues shapes co-curricular as well as academic programs. ICC established a Multicultural Speakers Forum which addressed issues of identity and pluralism from a national perspective and included local, prominent representatives of the Native-American, African-American, Mexican-American, Asian-American and Southern cultures.
FCC includes
extracurricular activities in its action plan for including multicultural perspectives.
Activities are designed to include the community as well as the campus. The
Social Science Division presented, "Growing Together in the Twentieth Century:
The Search for Common Values in the Midst of Our Diversity," a symposium which
included a student essay contest, a panel discussion by FCC students representing
the various ethnic groups who attend the college, and a celebration of multiculturalism.
The program was co-sponsored by FCC, Fresno State University, and community
service agencies in conjunction with the National Endowment for the Humanities
(FCC, 1997).
Faculty participation is essential to curricular changes. However, faculty who are trained in the traditional disciplines are not necessarily qualified to teach courses with a multicultural perspective (Reid, 1995). To address this issue, institutions do provide in-service forums as well as opportunities to attend conferences but these efforts do not always have an impact on the curriculum. In the Maricopa Community Colleges (Arizona), multiculturalism was made a faculty development priority in 1993-1994. Opportunities for discussion were made available but not required. As a result, only one or two of the 800 faculty members reported making changes in the curriculum as a result of these efforts (Story, 1997). Faculty commitment and preparation are necessary for the success of any curricular change. Story (1997) suggests that the administration must provide both time and resources to allow faculty to create and sustain a more inclusive curriculum.
Curricular
changes also require additional supporting materials. ICC’s action plan aims
to "enhance teaching and learning about American pluralism" through the restructuring
of courses as well as a commitment to new resources. The library acquired both
print and video materials which focus on the Native-American, African-American,
and Latino experience in the United States (ICC, 1997).
In recent years, a major goal of curricular change has been the inclusion of a multicultural perspective in order to prepare all students to participate in a society with a heightened sense of its own pluralism. Additionally, since community colleges are responsible for educating a large proportion of traditionally underrepresented students, the curriculum must be relevant and inclusive to encourage success among these students. Efforts at including a multicultural perspective in the curriculum include creating new courses and revamping existing ones, creating new departments and degree programs to support these courses, providing extracurricular activities, re-training faculty, and enhancing instructional materials.
To ensure
that students develop at least an understanding of the issues raised in a pluralistic
society, Takaki advocates that colleges go beyond creating multicultural courses
to establishing a multicultural requirement for graduation (Reid, 1995). According
to a 1992 survey (Reid, 1995), only 20 per cent of community colleges have a
multicultural general education requirement while 48 per cent of four-year institutions
have this requirement. A general education requirement coupled with the
curricular reform activities presented in this Digest are the sign of community
colleges commitment to creating environments in which diversity is accepted
and valued.
Eaton, J. S. (1997). Promoting coherence in the transfer process. In J.G. Gaff & J.L. Ratcliff (Eds.), Handbook of the undergraduate curriculum (pp. 558-570). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Foote, E. (1997) "Community Colleges: General Information and Resources." ERIC Digest. (EDO-JC-98-01).
Fresno City College. (1997) "Fresno City College, Exploring America's Communities. Progress Report." (ED 403 937).
Itawamba Community College. (1997) "Itawamba Community College, Exploring America's Communities Progress Report." (ED 403 943).
Nixon, J., Osborne, T. and Veyna. A. F. (1997) "American Pluralism in Microcosm: The City of Santa Ana as Text. " (ED 403 954).
Olguin, E. and Schmitz, B. (1997). Transforming the curriculum through diversity. In J.G. Gaff & J.L. Ratcliff (Eds.), Handbook of the undergraduate curriculum (pp. 436-456). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Piland, W. and Silva, C. (1996). "Multiculturalism and Diversity in the Community College Curriculum." Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 20 (1), 35-48.
Reid, G. (1995). "On Technology, Curricula, and Ethnic Diversity: Mapping the Route to the New Millennium." Community College Journal, 95, 65 (5), 18-24.
Story, N. O. (1996). Weaving
the American Tapestry: Multicultural Education in the Community College. In
R. L. Raby & N. Tarrow, (Eds.) Dimensions of the Community College: International,
Intercultural and Multicultural Perspectives. pp. 79-110. (ED 393 519).
The ERIC Clearinghouse is administered by the National Library of Education and operates under the OERI Contract No. ED-99-CO-0010. The opinions expressed in this Digest do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of OERI and no official endorsement by OERI should be inferred.
Return to the Clearinghouse's Home Page.
Citations preceded by an asterisk (*) refer to journal articles or other material unavailable from EDRS. Journal articles may be acquired through regular library channels, or purchased from article clearinghouses such as CARL Uncover at (800) 787-7979. Other material may be available either directly through the publishing agency, or from out-of-print vendors. ERIC documents (references with "ED" numbers) may be read on microfiche at approximately 900 libraries worldwide. To identify your local ERIC Resource Collection, connect to: http://www.ed.gov/BASISDB/EROD/eric/SF. Most documents may be ordered on microfiche or in paper copy from the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS) at (800) 443-ERIC. For more information about our products and services, please contact the ERIC Clearinghouse for Community Colleges by telephone at (800) 832-8256, or via the Internet at ericcc@ucla.edu.
Please help us keep the ERIC database current and comprehensive by submitting your written works to the Clearinghouse for review for inclusion in the ERIC system. Send two copies of each manuscript to the attention of our Acquisitions Coordinator.
ERIC Clearinghouse
for Community Colleges
University of California, Los Angeles
3051 Moore Hall
P.O. Box 951521
Los Angeles, CA 90095
Updated 10/10/01
Maintained by ericccus@gseis.ucla.edu